BUS 670 Week 4 DQ 2 Antitrust Law
Copy & Paste the link into your browser to get the tutorial:
http://www.homeworkmade.com/bus-670/bus-670-week-4-dq-2-antitrust-law/
Antitrust Law. Review the “AT&T Ends $39 Billion Bid for T-Mobile” article.
In 2011, AT&T attempted a merger with T-Mobile. The Justice Department sued under the act, claiming that the merger would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws. In 2012, AT&T dropped its attempt at the acquisition.
If AT&T had merged with T-Mobile, would the merger have violated antitrust laws? Why, or why not? Do not be unduly influenced by the Justice Department’s stance on the issue. Use your own analysis to reach a conclusion.
Guided Response:
Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner. Some ways to do this include the following, though you may choose a different approach, providing your response is substantive:
Agree or disagree with your classmate’s position. Defend your position by using information from the week’s readings or examples from current events.
BUS 670 Week 4 DQ 2 Antitrust Law
Copy & Paste the link into your browser to get the tutorial:
http://www.homeworkmade.com/bus-670/bus-670-week-4-dq-2-antitrust-law/
Antitrust Law. Review the “AT&T Ends $39 Billion Bid for T-Mobile” article.
In 2011, AT&T attempted a merger with T-Mobile. The Justice Department sued under the act, claiming that the merger would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws. In 2012, AT&T dropped its attempt at the acquisition.
If AT&T had merged with T-Mobile, would the merger have violated antitrust laws? Why, or why not? Do not be unduly influenced by the Justice Department’s stance on the issue. Use your own analysis to reach a conclusion.
Guided Response:
Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner. Some ways to do this include the following, though you may choose a different approach, providing...