# Analysing Cross-Sectional Data

## Analysing Cross-Sectional Data

• Submitted By: MARTINE23
• Date Submitted: 01/07/2011 11:26 PM
• Words: 1044
• Page: 5
• Views: 274

Analysing cross-sectional Data

Introduction |
Show which staff transport staff use, and comparison. |
Comparison of statistics, and description. | |
Comparison for cost | |
Conclusion | |

Question 1 Staffs method of transport

1: transport | female | male | Grand Total | % female | % male | % total |
bicycle | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5.8% | 8.6% | 6.9% |
bus | 17 | 8 | 25 | 19.8% | 13.8% | 17.4% |
car | 15 | 9 | 24 | 17.4% | 15.5% | 16.7% |
motorcycle | | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3.4% | 1.4% |
train | 17 | 14 | 31 | 19.8% | 24.1% | 21.5% |
underground | 18 | 15 | 33 | 20.9% | 25.9% | 22.9% |
walk | 14 | 5 | 19 | 16.3% | 8.6% | 13.2% |
Grand Total | 86 | 58 | 144 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |

The comparison of staff percentages, and also the frequencies tables. |
The table above show that the underground was the transport the most popular for staff rating at 23%, and the second most popular transport is the train rating at 22%. The table also show that there is 16.7% of staff using cars, and 6.9% of people used the bicycle. In total 61.8 staff used public transports, but 13.2% of staff walk to work.The table show that nearly 20% of female staff used the train as they method of transport again 25%of men. Also nearly 21 of female staff used underground, again nearly 26% of men.The table show that 13.3% of female staff walk to work compare to 8.6% of men. |
|

Question 2...