Better to die than to live a life bounded by four walls. This is the main thought behind the practice of euthanasia. May be due to accident or some disease, may be due to sudden disaster or slow weakness, a man could be cursed impair ness for life time,
Incurable paralysis or even could push to comma. And could decide whether to die or to live if he is conscious or on behalf of him his dearness could do for him for the reason of releasing him from the pain. Killing someone in such unjustified way has always been a matter of open discussion. Passive euthanasia or slow killing has more over a huge controversy but still it is more accepted by law than active euthanasia. Beside this no one has the right to decide the fate of someone else even if they are close to the patient. Thus, the implementation of euthanasia has always been a controversy and till yet it, seems to be so. Can it be justified? Is not the question, can we take lives of our close ones to free from their nursery is the concern.
The suffering and uncertain condition of a person always brings tears to their loved ones. Everyone wants their dear to be healthy and fit. No body can see someone close suffering. In case of, serious illness, accident or disaster when we get completely impaired or gets into coma his relative would try anything to cure him. But if the cure seems impossible and there is no hope for him to get better, they rather try choosing some different option. The option to grace him with death in order to free him from suffering. This is also practiced while, relatives feel the expenditure in treatment is high and the percentage of survive is quite low. Here, they feel it’s no use to expense such high amount without hope of getting positive results.