“Can the Fcc Legally Consider an Applicants Race and or Gender in Awarding Licenses to Broadcast Stations and Other Telecommunication Properties?”

“Can the Fcc Legally Consider an Applicants Race and or Gender in Awarding Licenses to Broadcast Stations and Other Telecommunication Properties?”

“Can the FCC legally consider an applicants race and or gender in awarding licenses to broadcast stations and other telecommunication properties?”

The courts judges have had a recurring question as to whether or not the FCCs policies are consistent with the constitution. Most of the cases involving this matter have been ruled by a majority decision. Some of the justices think that the policies omit equal opportunities amongst competitors. Such policies were set in order to balance the deficiency of certain races. The constitution was configured to establish a validity of equal rights. It’s up to congress and its legislation to enforce the laws and maintain them in all fairness. Like any other law, sanctions and exceptions have been included to further consistencies within law practices.

The Federal Communications Commission has been responsible for regulating the policies and rules of telecommunications. It’s an independent agency that was created under the executive branch during the Information Age.The law that established the FCC was the Communications Act of 1934. It is directed by five president appointed commissioners and is organized by several bureaus of purpose. They separately maintain applications of licenses, conduct hearings and investigations, and develop contracted programming. Their mission is plainly stately as “The FCC promotes telecommunications business opportunities for small, minority-owned, and women-owned businesses... foster a diversity of voices and viewpoints over the airwaves, and encourage participation in FCC proceedings. (497 US 547) The FCC standards are to make policies to enhance cultural diversity within the lines of communication world wide. The FCC believes in the saturation of information from a network dominated by racial group. This idea has been retaliated by saying the policies are incoherent with the Fifth Amendment. In the case, Metro Broadcasting, which commenced over a comparative hearing, was petitioned by a...

Similar Essays