Thesis Statement: Since the execution of James Kendall in 1608, capital punishment “has been an accepted form of justice” in what is now the United States.
Capital punishment can be defined as “the penalty of death for the commission of a crime.” In colonial America, both violent and non-violent crimes could merit the death penalty. Since the execution of James Kendall in 1608, capital punishment has been an accepted form of justice in what is now the United States.
Murder was not the only crime punishable by death. Criminals responsible for committing any crime against God would be executed. While our society does not execute individuals for supposedly practicing witchcraft or committing other sins against humanity, there is still a need for capital punishment. Not only should the death penalty be condoned, but improved upon to give criminals the punishments that are comparable to the crime responsible for their prosecution. The methods of executing criminals have evolved greatly since colonial times. Our government now uses the method of lethal injection, which causes the criminal to lose consciousness before he is injected with a poisonous substance. Prior to lethal injection, the gas chamber, the electric chair, the firing squad, and hanging are among the few methods of punishment being used. The death penalty has been improved, not only to execute the criminal faster, but to be as humane as possible.
As with all controversial issues, capital punishment is no stranger to opposition. Activist groups have gathered and published information pertaining to the inability of capital punishment to deter crime and of the United States justice system’s tendency to be prejudice in executions. The Moratorium Campaign, an anti-capital punishment group, posts information on their website regarding the flaws of capital punishment. Anti-capital punishment topics such as “Innocent people are sentenced to die” and “The death penalty is racially...