How Does Matthew Arnold Evaluate Chaucer’s Greatness?

How Does Matthew Arnold Evaluate Chaucer’s Greatness?

  • Submitted By: asmmustafiz
  • Date Submitted: 01/30/2014 7:57 AM
  • Category: English
  • Words: 314
  • Page: 2
  • Views: 31

00180—How does Matthew Arnold evaluate Chaucer’s greatness?

Matthew Arnold is an admirer of Chaucer’s poetry. He remarks that Chaucer’s power of fascination is enduring. “He will be read far more generally than he is read now.” The only problem that we come across is the difficulty of following his language. Chaucer’s superiority lies in the fact that “we suddenly feel ourselves to be in another world”. His superiority is both in the substance of his poetry and in the style of his poetry. “His view of life is large, free, simple, clear and kindly. He has shown the power to survey the world from a central, a human point of view.” The best example is his Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Matthew Arnold quotes here the words of Dryden who remarked about it; “Here is God’s plenty”. Arnold continues to remark that Chaucer is a perpetual fountain of good sense. Chaucer’s poetry has truth of substance; “Chaucer is the father of our splendid English poetry.” By the lovely charm of his diction, the lovely charm of his movement, he makes an epoch and founds a tradition. We follow this tradition in Spenser, Shakespeare, Milton and Keats. “In these poets we feel the virtue.” And the virtue is irresistible.

In spite of all these merits, Arnold says that Chaucer is not one of greatest classics. He has not their accent. To strengthen his argument Arnold compares Chaucer with the Italian classic Dante. Arnold says that Chaucer lacks not only the accent of Dante but also the high seriousness. “Homer’s criticism of life has it, Shakespeare has it, Dante has it, and Shakespeare has it.” Thus in his critical essay “The Study of Poetry” Matthew Arnold comments not only on the merits of Chaucer’s poetry, but also on the short comings. He glorifies Chaucer with the remark, “With him is born our real poetry.”

|
|
|

Similar Essays