Ending someone’s life isn’t right if they do not have a say in it but assisted suicide is not ending someone’s without permission. In my opinion, assisted suicide is the most humane action. Why is it unfair to keep a pet alive when it are suffering from pain or illness but not to keep a human alive if they are going through the same thing suffering? Euthanasia is not a good way to end someone’s life. You do not have the person’s say so. Dr. Kevorkian’s approach to mercy killing was much more humane than just killing someone who had no say.
Assisted suicide in my opinion is best way to make sure it is what the person really wants.. Assisted suicide is just help a person end their life, they do it themselves all you do is give them the supplies that are needed for it and tell them how to go about it. No one wants to live a painful or very sick life. If someone’s life is coming to end why not end it in a pain free way that is on their own terms. They may not want anyone like family or family friends to see them suffer. People tend to become depressed because their loved one is suffering from an illness. According tohttp://euthanasia.procon.org/ it is legalized in four states, Montana, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, but I believe every state skills allow for this to happen. We should not allow people who are going to for anyway to suffer if they wish to end their lives.
Euthanasia is when a doctor ends a patients life without their permission. When they feel like it’s time for a patient to go they end their life. This is the worst way to end someone’s life in my opinion. I would feel guilty if I used this method. I don’t think this should be legalized in any states or any other countries although it is legal in some places.
Dr. Kevorkian’s way of handling the suffering of patients was using the assisted suicide method. I think this is the most humane method. Although people think most killing in any way is wrong, he understood the pain...