Kant truly believes that free will is essential to perform an act of moral obligation, that how we choose to act is ultimately our decision, therefore we can decide to fulfill or not to fulfill the obligation. It is an obligation that one is advised to perform, however they are not legally bound to fulfill the advised duty. Moral actions are in someway predetermined by characteristic attributes, whether kind or wicked; either way, these actions always have an effect on the receiver.
Observations find that the recipients experience, simply put, bad or good feelings. These feelings then create moral disapproval or approval of the initial act performed. Immanuel Kant’s belief of morality derives from the idea that each individual makes choices at their own free will, that no outside force pushes us to make moral or immoral decisions. His idea is that we cannot acquire morality without being self-legislating beings. Kant suggests that the easiest, most reliable way to be 'moral' is to conduct yourself in such a way that you could decide will as a universal law with this said, Kant has little confidence in humans morality. His feeble faith descends from seeing humans as easily corruptible beings. This is true because beings regularly have conflicting wants and or desires with morality.
Immanuel Kant disputes with human reason because he believes that it is controlled by our failing ability to supply a true example of morality. Kant's writing states that what humans apprehend to be morally good does not undoubtedly fit the conditions of what can classify as a universal law. He finds it essential for humankind to hold morality as an absolute idea, meaning that there shall not be any exceptions because if there is one exception for even one person, it suddenly becomes universal law and thus the absolute idea of morality must be one-hundred percent free of human rationalization. Because desires and circumstances constantly change, human rationality is...