To fully understand the various social class system assessments, there are a number of factors that come into consideration based on the due relevance of the determination of an individual’s class position. This will include their education, the social background of their parents, their standard of living, their ownership of consumer durables, their accent and dress, their leisure pursuits, the value of their home, their social connections and circle of friends as well as their power and influence in society (Scott & Leonhardt, 2005). The justification of information is useful even though again, it will broadly speak of the factors raised by functionalists and conflict theorists in the event that they are closely connected with the person’s occupation, income and wealth (Horwitz, 2011). For instance, people defined to be in the upper or upper-middle category due to the scope of their wealth; occupation and income have the high likelihood of being well educated and hence enjoy high living standards and expensive pursuits of leisure.
This will include their ability to mix with different types of people affording similar life styles. Even as the consumer, durables and homes are part of the personal wealth of an individual. Conversely, it becomes highly unlikely that people within manual work that is poorly paid having limited personal wealth enjoy expensive leisure pursuits and high living standards (Branco, 2006). Therefore, in the assessment of people’s social class position, it is critical to concentrate on the income levels, scope of wealth and form of occupation as other factors will have to be listed for cases that will be connected with aspects of income, occupation and wealth (Anderson, 2003). The centers of the dispute above these statistical trends within the distribution of association within the social classes vary depending upon the levels of wealth and the value of dwellings.
Anderson E., (2003) The Legacy of DuBois: American Journal of...