Ok the first paragraph and the second have two totally different meanings. Now first is about the conception of love and what we get out of it. Now the second is Very strange it talk more about why should one love, does it confuse solicitation. Now by those two sentences I can tell you these two paragraphs are no alike. If the second would have talked about love andthe meaning it would have worked. At the end of the second one I talks about love upsetting morals and toppling it over and that is one other reason these two are none alike. Now the fourth and first paragraphs are seemingly alike in a lot of ways. They both talk happy love and is it serious. For Example: the fourth says “happy love is it necessary” and the first says “happy love Is it normal. Now they both have the same concept and that is love is it required in life. But there is one problem in the fourth paragraph it says “It’s Tactful and sensible to ignore this scandal in Life’s high sphere. So it’s saying not to fall in love because it’s just going to hurt you in the long run. Other than that last sentence these two sentences are very much alike. Now between the last paragraph and forth. This was very hard but they are alike in a way. For example: the last paragraph talks about fine babies born without assistance. And the fourth talks about to be abandoned. Now born without assistance is the same as being abandoned. So they are in common because of that they mean now one who is abandoned at childhood will most likely not know what true love is. The best true love anyone can feel is by their parents. That is how I think they are common and uncommon.