I do believe that to a certain extent there is a difference between obeying orders and obeying a law. To obey the law one must abide by the same rules as everybody else. On the other hand, to obey an order is distinguished by one’s role. For example, everyone must obey the law that one is not allowed to consume an alcoholic beverage under the age of 21. If one is the age of 21 or older and enjoys an alcoholic beverage, then he or she is obeying the law. But, if one who is under the age of 21 has a drink, then he or she is disobeying the law, which could possibly lead to legal consequences. Now, an example of obeying an order could have something to do with one’s position pertaining to their occupation. For instance, I work as a secretary for a law firm, and as part of my job I have to constantly take orders from my boss. When my boss tells me to file papers or get him or her, a cup of coffee, then that is an order which I am obligated to respond to. If I decide to disobey that order, I may be punished, but I do not have to deal with any legal consequences. By saying “no, I will not file these papers” it would lead to me being let go or “fired”. This is just one instance though.
A law can be defined as a principle or regulation setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity, such as a law for kidnapping. An order is a command given by a superior, such as a boss or a military officer, which must be obeyed. The difference between the two is simple. The breaking of a law will disable one’s ability to partake in certain activities and may lead jail time. For example, if I get pulled over operating a vehicle without a valid driver’s license then I have broken the law. My consequence for that action may be the penalty of a suspended driver’s license for a period of time. The disobedience of an order will not lead to any legal penalties, and aside for it leading to financial problems (losing your job), I cannot think of any other punishable act for...