As machines are getting more and more advanced day by day and complex in the concomitant world. Whether a machine is veteran of knowing its alacrity and its ramification of rising is an important topic and a great question. The banal defining of a machine is a device that performs work or a task. The casual definition of knowledge for it is to be justified true beliefs, in the words of Plato; Edmund suggested that those conditions sometimes are not sufficient, Edmund. L. Gettier, “is justified true belief of knowledge?” analysis, vol,23, no6, June, 1963, pp, 121- 123. Extensively in a case of machines, also serving as a criterion for knowledge being performed by the understanding of the process of correctly executing the task cerebration from these definitions, there is strong declaration for the case that machines do have capacity to know. The task of a machine is transforming energy into useful work or vice versa, when it performs. All types of machines applies the same principle, for example, clocks, electric machines, and mechanics devices etc. due to the design of the machine, where components of machine work together to transform energy into work, then the machine must process knowledge to carry out task. Example for this knowledge; Celtic bagpipes cannot perform as African drumbeats due to the limitations of its design and purpose. However, machines must process knowledge in order to carry out the intended task. To clarify the claim; I as a native Indian speaker can translate a Indian text to English easily, whereas my friend George cannot guilelessly because I acquire knowledge of translation between the languages as I know both of them, but George does not. Equivalently, the components and computer software working does not grant the knowledge to conduct underwater as in a space shuttle. When a machine components working in synch revamps into the knowledge of the machine, as they together makes the machine works, in the assumption of a machine possess...