Name of Reviewer:
In addition to responding to the following, please use the text highlight and insert comment functions on your colleague’s document.
Checklist
APA
Running head, complete cover page, title on page 2, indented, in-text paraphrase, in-text direct quotations, references page, and proper reference format. (Cross reference Purdue Owl to make sure.)
Comments:
Sections
The FAC has the required 4sections (sub-headers/bolded): – Intro – Summary - Evaluation - Response/Conclusion Comments:
Comments:
Introduction
(For this assignment) 1 sentence about author’s credibility based on research.
Comments:
Summary
Sub-header only
No text required for this assignment
Comments:
Evaluation
Raises generalized/categorical objections and/or agreements regarding the author’s support strategies
Use academic descriptions to review the text. (See language presented in PPTs and logical fallacies.)
Supplies specific evidence/examples for objections or agreements from the original text.
A minimum of 2 direct quotations
All directly quoted passages are properly cited.
Comments:
Response/Conclusion
Contains the student’s personal opinions of the text?
How did it make your feel?
What intellectual, emotional, spiritual, moral and/or professional reactions were experienced?
What were the aims of the work?
Were the aims achieved?
Why or why not? (The answers are a summary of ideas expressed in Evaluation section)
How could the author make improvements?
What would you recommend the text for? A university course, entertainment, science?
Looks like the sample on ilearn.
Comments:
Grammar
There are few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling.
Language and sentence structure vary significantly from original.
Comments:
Reference page
Correct reference for online newspaper – see Purdue Owl –
Comments: