Debate on the Legalization of Marijuana
From the past 40 years, the authorized status of marijuana has been debated dynamically. The Marijuana Tax Act was enforces in 1937. It make compulsory for sellers to get a license. Blanket prohibition was not the objective. The law approved quickly and with little dispute. The American Medical Association (AMA) protested the law soon after, both on the basis of actual discrepancy in the law and the support of Marijuana Tax Act lies. Drugs mostly stated medically, politically, socially or religiously unhealthy for use and should be banned. The lawful place of marijuana alters all over the world, showing how Governments pay their attention to this issue. Beginning a blanket ban suppressing all use, to allowing particular amounts for private use, the legalization of marijuana fights different fights in different countries. However points of view in FAVOR and AGAINST the legalization of marijuana stay the same.
The initiatives have gained wide marijuana users support, specifically in Washington where enforcement of local law officials has approved it. They force that marijuana drug use is no more unsafe than alcohol use, and it could be less so. Lawful ban does not prevent customers from consuming marijuana drug; it does not prevent drug dealer from manufacturing and selling it. Cost of the finished drug increase to the high prices just because of the black market class, which enforce the drug users to use the way of crime to buy a drug of such a high value and price. Marijuana drug is helpful in treatment and prevention Glaucoma and Alzheimer, which is in other words, helps reduce anxiety, apprehension, and sadness, reduce the growth of tumor, and helps reduce pain for radiation treatment patients as well. It does not lead to or cause lung cancer. Drug adductors use their own free will when they take the decision to try drug; an individual has the right to do things according to his or her own liberty. A stat does not have...