miranda case

miranda case

Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for 1,IP
Date/Time of Request:
Client Identifier:
Database:
Citation Text:
Lines:
Documents:
Images:

Sunday, May 13, 2012 10:33 Central
CHINACU
SCTFIND
86 S.Ct. 1602
4500
1
0

The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters,
West and their affiliates.

86 S.Ct. 1602
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY
Page 1
384 U.S. 436, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 36 O.O.2d 237, 39 O.O.2d 63
(Cite as: 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602)

tained in violation of Fifth Amendment privilege
against self-incrimination.
Supreme Court of the United States
Ernesto A. MIRANDA, Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF ARIZONA.
Michael VIGNERA, Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK.
Carl Calvin WESTOVER, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,
v.
Roy Allen STEWART.
Nos. 759—761, 584.
Argued Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966.
Decided June 13, 1966.
Rehearing Denied No. 584 Oct. 10, 1966.
See 87 S.Ct. 11.
Criminal prosecutions. The Superior Court,
Maricopa County, Arizona, rendered judgment,
and the Supreme Court of Arizona, 98 Ariz. 18,
401 P.2d 721, affirmed. The Supreme Court,
Kings County, New York, rendered judgment,
and the Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department, 21 A.D.2d 752, 252
N.Y.S.2d 19, affirmed, as did the Court of Appeals of the State of New York at 15 N.Y.2d 970,
259 N.Y.S.2d 857, 207 N.E.2d 527. The United
States District Court for the Northern District of
California, Northern Division, rendered judgment, and the United States Court of Appeals for
the Ninth Circuit, 342 F.2d 684, affirmed. The
Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California,
rendered judgment and the Supreme Court of
California, 62 Cal.2d 571, 43 Cal.Rptr. 201, 400
P.2d 97, reversed. In the first three cases, defendants obtained certiorari, and the State of California obtained certiorari in the fourth case. The Supreme...

Similar Essays