PPA 403 Tutorials / ppa403dotcom

PPA 403 Tutorials / ppa403dotcom

PPA 403 Entire Course (Ash)


For more course tutorials visit
www.ppa403.com


PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 1 Values in Administrative Law
PPA 403 Week 1 DQ 2 The Federal Register
PPA 403 Week 1 Quiz
PPA 403 Week 2 DQ 1 Constitutional Limits on Agencies
PPA 403 Week 2 DQ 2 Public Access to Information
PPA 403 Week 2 Quiz
PPA 403 Week 3 DQ 1 Bias in Administrative Law
PPA 403 Week 3 DQ 2 Rulemaking in Practice
PPA 403 Week 3 Quiz
PPA 403 Week 3 The Continuum of Legal Formality
PPA 403 Week 4 DQ 1 Administrative Enforcement Tools
PPA 403 Week 4 DQ 2 Judicial Review
PPA 403 Week 4 Quiz
PPA 403 Week 5 DQ 1 Affirmative Action Policies
PPA 403 Week 5 DQ 2 Privatization and Administrative Law
PPA 403 Week 5 Final Paper




--------------------------------------------------------



PPA 403 Week 2 DQ 2 Public Access to Information (Ash)


For more course tutorials visit
www.ppa403.com



Public Access to Information. Public access to information and sunshine laws should be considered in all communication by all public servants (whether you are a line staff member or agency director). Technology adds another dimension to what is covered under administrative law in this area. E-mail correspondence can be requested under the freedom of information laws. Should e-mail communication among government officials also have to comply with sunshine laws? According to most sunshine laws, officials cannot meet to discuss public business without notifying the public of the meeting in advance. Consider the following scenario: In the case of Spokane County, Washington, there are only three county commissioners, so any communication between any two of them is automatically a policy-making majority. A reporter for the local paper asked the commissioners to release all of their e-mail over the past two months concerning county business. Assume that you are the attorney general in your state in charge of sunshine law enforcement. Given the political objectives of...

Similar Essays