12, April 2014
Mairs rejects the labels “handicapped” and “disabled,” preferring ”crippled” even though many see it as offensive. Her handling of her condition is much different from that of David Sedaris’s handling of his in “A Plague of Tics”. Both Mairs and Sedarsis label themselves and their conditions in completely distinctive ways. Likewise, they also welcome and refrain from certain labels for otherwise unrelated reasons.
Mairs presents three unique implications of "weakened", "crippled", and "incapacitated" and why she acknowledges that she falls in the last. She upholds that the label "handicap" precisely delineates her because it’s an immediate strategy for communicating that she's "lost the full use of limbs." On the other hand, "debilitated" suggests "insufficiency, physical or mental" and "handicapped" is described as being "put by surprise." The capability between the three words is essential to Mairs' presentation of herself as individuals have a tendency to request "weakened", "crippled", and "incapacitated" under one brand of freedom. Mairs' separation between the three words helps in helping herself separate between who she shows herself as and who social request acknowledge she appears to be.
Startlingly, as Mairs reprimands society’s choice of labeling her condition as "differently abled," she showcases her specific statement that comes joined with pride in winning the "debilitated individual" reward. She needs people tremble when they see her in light of the way that potentially they will "see her as a human being who can defy the wild truth of her vicinity undoubtedly". This shows how Mairs does not waste her time wondering how people judge the representation "tested individual"; it’s almost certain who she chooses to display herself to...