Imagine a society where there wasn't any government assistance. Do you think our society would be more productive or more poverty-stricken? There are occasions where we have very stereotypical views about the welfare program. Society has created the assumptions that it's minorities, unwed mothers, or the disabled are on welfare. Then there's the question, `Should welfare be eliminated as an governmental assistance program?' No, I don't believe welfare should be eliminated, but there should be certain stipulations.
Many are either strong advocates for welfare or they despise the federal aid. Several believe that welfare isn't effective in training to get a job, or to improve circumstances. From my observation, more people support the idea of the program, but not the way the system distributes the federal money.
After the Great Depression Era, President Franklin Roosevelt implemented a governmental aid program now known as welfare. When the program was first implemented, it was for those who had been immersed by poverty from the depression. Throughout this program the government also offered jobs to help you make it through certain difficult circumstances. After having the job for a while, the situation would improve and you were off welfare. Initially, the program TANF (Temporary Assistance For Needy Families) was started to help the people through complicated times, but this program is now abused. People abuse the system through excessive use of the federal dollars. The program was designed for people to stay on the program for two to three years, not for extended periods of time. Countless who start out on welfare stay on welfare, and use it as a crutch. Statistics show that generations of families are raised with governmental assistance programs. This isn't fair for those who actually need the assistance. There are many who are having difficult times and can't get assistance because there are too many abusing the...