The separation of the church and state in all of the countries has always been the up-to-date issue at all times. However, it happens so that sometimes people define wrongly the actual definition of ‘church and state separation’. Generally, this separation presupposes that government does not get involved in the business of the church, and the church itself does not get involved in the business of state. The church is such an institution that should exist independently as another important cooperation in a country.
However, it can be observed now that today's church is politically dependent, which promises it's not a very good future. Religion and politics are things incompatible and different. It is necessary to remember, although, that religion sets some laws the nation should follow in order to build and maintain social harmony and thinking society.
“Both the free exercise clause and the establishment clause place restrictions on the government concerning laws they pass or interfering with religion. (‘Separation of Church and State’, All about History).
It is not that easy to separate constitutionally the notions of church and state. In order to do this, it is inevitable to carefully review the history of religious perceptions and viewpoints of European countries and the United States of America. As it is known, American saying to “separate church from state” has risen from the desire of some Baptists to highlight the importance of freedom of church institutions and organizations. Besides,it is known that throughout the centuries there were wars happening between the different religions in Europe and in the USA. Therefore, the government was supposed to take some preventive measures to stop the disagreements that could lead to the division of countries. (Flax, Forbes).
Definitely, as the Constitution states, there should be no involvement of the state in the affairs of the church. Because it not only breaks the universal constitutional laws, but also...