Why do those who are stronger have a natural right to dominate those who are weaker? Imagine a world, where you have to listen to the strong and listen to the weak. Only the strong can stop you from what your hearts desire. The world would be catastrophic because of how the government and the president will be corrupt due to their power and rank in life. An example of how stronger have a natural right to dominate those who are weaker is that in Mexico, before Cortez it was morally acceptable to have child sacrifice, in the South before the Civil War, slavery was acceptable. Why did morality change? Also in Hitler’s Germany, killing the Jews was a noble act! Did it become wrong only because Germany lost the war? In Mexico, it was morally acceptable to have child sacrifice. This is an example of how the strong will tend to dominate those who are weaker and make them sacrifice their child due to a religious practice. In order for the Mexico and its leaders to take over and control the weak, they had to show that they were strong and that anything was able to happen. If a weak was to rebel, the leaders would instantaneously kill that person which will result to the weak listening to the strong. This also occurs because of how the weak would persuade each other to listen to the strong. This is wrong because the weak are the ones who are helping their society and giving up a child for religious purpose is just wrong. The strong does not have the write to dominate the weak. Another example is Hitler’s German and what they did to the Jews. Hitler and Germany ruled as war heroes, but when Hitler brought all the Jews to concentration camps because he thought the Jews were up to something was just wrong because of this, Hitler became a great influence to the weak and making them listens to him more. In order for Hitler to create this influence on the weak he had to show that he was capable of doing which resulted in the concentration camp where millions of Jews were...