Skull Beneath the Skin first published in 1982 reflects the increasing social concerns of post-World War II Cold war as well as the rising feminist movement and transitional class divisions. PD James cleverly reflects the emerging individualist movement through the family relations of Sir George Ralston, Clarrissa Lisle, Roma Lisle, and Simon Lessing. The notion of George Ralston being Clarissa’s third husband, as well as an envious cousin and a financially and emotionally withdrawn stepson, PD James heightens the individualistic notion through the dysfunctional, non-cohesive family unit. This is further strengthened by the rhetoric pondering conversation between Grogan and Buckley. “Did you notice how she and Ralston gave almost identical accounts of his visit to Kingly Street, what he said, what she said? It was so neat it could have been rehearsed.” The feasible regard of Gray and Ralston assisting in the murder of his wife highlights gothic elements of a tyrannical dominant male figure and demonstrates a reserved relationship. The value of life is focally represented through PD James’ character Cordelia Gray. The title, signifies our mortality in conjunction with the characters Clarrissa, continually focuses on dying, Ivo is dying from cancer, Gorringe satisfies his fascination by surround himself with objects of death. Clarrissa notes “It’s my death I’m afraid of” and “I don’t remember when it began but I know the facts of death before I know the facts of life. There never was a time I didn’t see the skull beneath the skin.” All these characters in stark contrast to Gray, accentuates the preciousness of life pertinent to her time, just after the closure of the Second World War. She exclaims “My life counted for less than your comfort, your possessions, your private world. My life!” The use of cumulative listing, elucidates Ambrose’s disregard for life and Gray’s value of life. PD James unlike most cosy crime novels does not end her tale with a resolved...