RJDT Task 1
Top of Form
Levels/Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Needs Revision
Satisfactory
Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
A. Constructive Discharge
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how constructive discharge as a legal concept is relevant to the scenario.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with insufficient support, of how constructive discharge as a legal concept is relevant to the scenario.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with sufficient support, of how constructive discharge as a legal concept is relevant to the scenario.
B. Title VII
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of areas covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that are relevant to the scenario.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of areas covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that are relevant to the scenario.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of areas covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that are relevant to the scenario.
C. Company Response
The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of how the company should respond to the employee’s charge of constructive discharge.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with insufficient support, of how the company should respond to the employee’s charge of constructive discharge.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with sufficient support, of how the company should respond to the employee’s charge of constructive discharge.
C1. Legal Reference
The candidate includes 0–1 legal references supporting the candidate’s recommendation.
The candidate includes 2 legal...